Restriction of skilled operators’ right
to work on construction sites
Are you aware…Are you aware that some of the large construction companies are demanding that any workers on their sites must have CPCS training, with no other legal training certificates or cards being accepted?? This is blatant discrimination against fully legal training companies who deliver courses to improve site safety and are audited and monitored on an annual basis to confirm good practices. Is it fair and decent to make already qualified workers who have done the required training to the nationally accepted standards (using the Approved Code of Practice (ACOP), HASAWA, PUWER and LOLER regulations) retrain and pay CPCS to be a member of their training scheme instead? Online PetitionWe are starting an online petition to hand to Downing Street to have this investigated and any other cases where operators are forced to have a specific card or certificate – which is ABSOLUTE RUBBISH. Any training companies certificates or cards is enough to operate
|
|
Who owns CPCS and who are the directors? They seem to charge more for training than any other companies — sub–contractors and operators are being forced into an expensive scheme they don’t want to join. Who is responsible for making the decision to nominate this scheme as the one and only? Is it a closed shop on these building sites? Questions we would all like the answer to. Should we do the same?Should all other sites refuse CPCS cards? No, as that would make everyone else as bad as them! Common sense needs to prevail here and we need to let everyone choose their own training providers. We support all legal training companies that train as long as they train to the HSE recognised standards and only want these construction companies to do the same. Would it not be a monopoly to only have one scheme with no choice for operators? Surely they would then just charge what they wanted for training because there would be no competition. This is all the fault of the construction companies who are dictating that only certain cards are allowed on their worksites — they even insist sub-contractors have their choice of training qualification! This cannot be right when the public has a choice of legal schemes and trainers to choose from whether that be by price or location — it is their own choice. Nothing to do with Health and SafetyThis practice has nothing to do with health & safety – all training companies aim to improve that. It’s simply about taking full control and being the only training companies. We support any improvements to safety but also support competition and free choice of who delivers training for workers needs. We are calling for the directors of the construction companies to make the decision to allow skilled operators who hold any legal and valid training certificates or cards jobs on their sites. It would be stupid to only have one car manufacturer, one supermarket brand, and so on… So why only allow one training scheme?!??!? This is not new!Large construction companies have recently been prosecuted for blacklisting workers in the 80′s and are now being forced to pay £££££££ in compensation. Let’s have this stopped now before it is necessary to do the same again for restricting qualified operators work on building sites.Power to the British workers!
|
Endorsed and Supported by:
- Fork Lift Truck & Plant Training
- Plant Construction & Warehouse Operators
- Acuitive Training
- Personal Track Safety
- We Are in Plant
- Court Specialist Training Solutions
- Forklift Training Academy Ltd
- J & D Training Solutions Limited
- Forktruck borders instruction Ltd
- Indumission Limited
- Pro Active Vision
- Berkeley Vale Community Rail-Link Project
- Knowledge Grid LLC
- Stride Safety Ltd